From: rbaer@atsu.edu Full_Name: Rob Baer Version: 2.0.0 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (198.209.172.106) Request/wish summary: state the alternative hypothesis before the t-test and p-value A typical cor.test output looks like the following: > x=runif(30)*10 > y=runif(30)*10 > cor.test(x,y) Pearson's product-moment correlation data: x and y t = 0.6161, df = 28, p-value = 0.5428 alternative hypothesis: true correlation is not equal to 0 95 percent confidence interval: -0.2552588 0.4568795 sample estimates: cor 0.1156454 -------------------------------------------------------------- Rationale I have the recurring problem of students misinterpreting the alternative hypothesis statement as an interpretation of the t-test p-value not as a "tail decision". The "quick students" think R has made a mistake. The "slow students" (please save me) accept the alternative hypothesis with huge p-values "because the program told them to". All students seem confused. If this had affected a single group of students, I'd let it go, but this is a recurring theme with each new crop. Proposed fix. Generaly, we decide on an alternative hypothesis (or should) as an a priori statement. I think that there would be MUCH LESS confusing if the printed hypothesis statement came BEFORE the t-test and p-value output. This should put it in conceptual sequence; it would not be so easily confused with an interpretation. This same problem happens in some other test output as well. For these, a similar order change could greatly reduce confusion about what is being stated. If the output code is shared, the fix would only have to be done once. Thanks for considering it.

Audit (from Jitterbug): Wed Oct 27 22:16:46 2004 ripley moved from incoming to wishlist