Bug 17189 - R-devel does not set CXX1X, CXX1XSTD on compilers without full C++11 support
Summary: R-devel does not set CXX1X, CXX1XSTD on compilers without full C++11 support
Alias: None
Product: R
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Installation (show other bugs)
Version: R-devel (trunk)
Hardware: Other Linux-Ubuntu
: P5 normal
Assignee: R-core
Depends on:
Reported: 2016-12-01 13:04 UTC by Jim Hester
Modified: 2017-03-24 17:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Jim Hester 2016-12-01 13:04:55 UTC
R-devel does not set CXX1X, CXX1XSTD on compilers without full C++11 support. This is a departure from the current behavior of R 3.3.2, which does set these variables if the compiler has at least some support for C++11.

A reproducible example of the behavior can be found at https://github.com/jimhester/rocker/tree/master/r-devel/precise#readme along with instructions on reproducing. The repository directory can be checked out using git, or svn with
 `svn co https://github.com/jimhester/rocker/trunk/r-devel/precise`.

A example case is ubuntu precise, which uses g++ 4.6.3. This compiler version does not have full support for C++11, but does have partial support. In previous R versions CXX1X and CXX1XSTD were set to `g++` and `-std=c++0x` respectively. With the current R-devel they are unset.

If a R package uses only supported C++11 features they can be successfully compiled with g++ 4.6.3 using R 3.3.2, but will fail to compile with R-devel.

Ideally we would like to retain the flags for partial support, while still setting e.g. `-std=c++11` if the compiler has full support for C++11.
Comment 1 Martyn Plummer 2017-03-11 18:19:47 UTC
I don't think I can do anything about this. The macros that we use to determine whether a compiler supports C++11 are adapted from standard macros in the GNU autoconf archive. We use ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx_11.m4 (serial 3) in R 3.3.x and ax_cxx_compile_stdcxx.m4 (serial 4) in R-devel. 

There is a ratchet effect as the macros evolve and become more stringent. For example the number of lines of C code in the test program for C++11 is 18 in the current release of R and 282 in R-devel. So it is not surprising that an older compiler, supporting only a few C++11 features, is no longer accepted.

I'm sorry for people on older platforms who find that things will stop working. In my defence, end of life for Ubuntu precise is in April, when the release of R 3.4.0 is expected.
Comment 2 Jim Hester 2017-03-11 18:37:43 UTC
That is fair and I expected the cause was similar to what you described. Is there any change we could make that would produce more useful error messages than the current behavior? Right now the CXX1X variables are simply unset, which makes for very confusing error messages. See <https://travis-ci.org/hadley/devtools/jobs/153316405#L1973 for an example>.

Ideally if a package has `CXX_STD = CXX11` or `SystemRequirements: C++11` and the relevant CXX1X make variables are unset R should fail with an appropriate error indicating the compiler does not support C++11.

Thanks for looking into this!
Comment 3 Martyn Plummer 2017-03-20 09:56:06 UTC
OK I have added some informative error messages to R-devel. You should now get "C++11 standard requested but CXX1X is not defined" in your example, and similar messages for the other standards.
Comment 4 Jim Hester 2017-03-20 10:37:06 UTC
Great thanks Martyn!
Comment 5 Jeroen Ooms 2017-03-23 13:29:08 UTC
Sorry I missed this topic.

The problem with strictly enforcing CXX_STD is that you encourage package authors to avoid it, which is unfortunate. A package author might prefer CXX14, but can't actually specify this if this means R refuses to build the package on most systems, even though it would actually work.

Ideally, R would raise a warning instead of an error when building a package with an unsupported CXX standard, and then fall back on the latest supported standard. For example when the compiler is unaware of "-std=c++14", instead of leaving Makeconf fields blank, configure could set:

CXX14 = CXX11

etc. This allows package authors to adopt modern standards without losing users with a slightly older compiler. Anyway apparently not many people care about LTS systems so I will stop complaining about this.
Comment 6 Martyn Plummer 2017-03-24 17:28:09 UTC
I have made the C++11 feature tests conditional, so that if gcc < 4.8 is used then the same feature tests are used in R-devel as in R 3.3.x. If this does not cause any trouble then I will port it to R-3-4-branch in due course.

This change means that the C++11 support will be maintained for LTS platforms using older releases of gcc. I have tested it on CentOS 6 (gcc 4.4.7).

Jeroen, I don't understand the point your are trying to make in your last comment. I'm closing this bug report now but if you want to take these issues up on the R-devel list then we can continue the conversation there.